RAJARAM NANA INGALE DIED THR LRS KANTABAI RAJARAM INGALE v. The State of Maharashtra Thr Collector Osmanabad
CA/10953/2026 · 2026-09-23
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13777 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13777 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
937-CA-10953-26.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10953 OF 2026 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 13619 OF 2023 Rajaram Nana Ingale (Died) Through L.Rs. Kantabai Rajaram Ingale and Others ..APPLICANTS VERSUS State of Maharashtra and Others ..RESPONDENTS .... Mr. P.B. Rakhunde, Advocate for Applicants Mr. K.B. Jadhavar, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 Mr. S.P. Sonpawale, Advocate for Respondent No.3 ....
CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
DATE : 23rd SEPTEMBER, 2026 PER COURT :
1. It is submitted that during the pendency of the first appeal, the original claimant – Rajaram Nana Ingale died, leaving behind him his legal representatives i.e. Applicant Nos. 1-A, 1-B, 1-C and 1-D. It is further informed that even Applicant No.1-C – Ratnadeep Rajaram Ingale also died, leaving behind his legal representative i.e. Applicant No.1-C-1.
2. It is submitted that the present application is filed to direct the appellants to incorporate the names of present applicants as legal representatives of deceased – Rajaram Nana Ingale in the first appeal. 1 / 2 2026:BHC-AUG:43924
937-CA-10953-26.odt
3. Also, there is delay of 1944 days caused in filing this application. It is submitted that for want of knowledge about pendency of the present proceeding, the applicants could not earlier approach this Court through Advocate. There is no deliberate delay in filing the application.
4. For the reasons stated in the application, same is allowed. Delay is condoned. Abatement, if any, is quashed and set aside. The appellants shall amend the cause title of the first appeal and applications therein within a period of four weeks form today.
( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. ) SSD 2 / 2