Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13776 (JHR)

KAMAL GOPE v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./840/2026 · 2026-02-13

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:4245 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 840 of 2026 ---- Kamal Gope, aged about 53 years, son of Mukhlal Gope, resident of village- Hesalong, P.O.- Hesalong, P.O.- Hazaribag Sadar, District- Hazaribag (Jharkhand0 .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey-2, Advocate For the State :- Mrs. Mohua Palit, A.P.P. ---- 02/13.02.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Giddi P.S. Case No.11 of 2023 for the alleged offences registered under Sections 406, 420, 34 of Indian Penal Code, pending in the Court of learned J.M.F.C., Hazaribag. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that Sukhram Baidiya, Jamil Renu, Jasim Alam and others had induced the informant to invest money in the name of coal DO and Colliery business of Religarha, Piparwar, Giddi and Jharkhand collieries by assuring high and guaranteed profit. He further submits that allegation is further made that petitioner was induced saying that the invested money would rotate monthly and profit would be credited in his bank account. He next submits that investment was made in the account of Sukhram Baidiya, Jamil Renu, Jasim Alam and they have been granted anticipatory bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in A.B.A. No.5484/2023 and 5147/2023. -2- 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that only allegation is thereof transaction of the money in the account of the petitioner. 5. Considering that the persons who had induced for investment to the informant, they have been granted anticipatory bail in the aforesaid A.B.A., I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of his surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned J.M.F.C., Hazaribag, in connection with Giddi P.S. Case No.11 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 13.02.2026 Jay/