OM PRAKASH SHARMA S/O SHRI JAGDISH PRASAD v. RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION
CW/14709/2026 · 2026-08-07
Sameer Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13773 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13773 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:31012] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14709/2026 CNR: RJHC020660302026 | URN: CW / 31498U / 2026 Om Prakash Sharma S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Mohalla Divrala, Shrimadhopur, District Sikar (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus
1. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through Chairman Cum Managing Director, Parivahan Marg, Chomu House, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Srimadhopur Depot, Srimadhopur, District Sikar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Ghiya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajpal Dhankar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 07/08/2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner places reliance upon the
order dated 21.05.2024 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7748/2024, titled Ghanshyam v. RSRTC & Ors. It is submitted that the controversy involved in the present matter is squarely covered by the ratio laid down in the aforesaid decision.
2.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent- RSRTC is unable to refute the said contention and fairly submits that he has no objection if the present matter is decided in light of the judgment referred to above.
[2026:RJ-JP:31012] (2 of 2) [CW-14709/2026]
3. In view of the aforesaid submissions advanced by the respective counsel and in light of the ratio laid down in order dated 21.05.2024 passed in Ghanshyam (supra), the present writ petition stands disposed of in the same terms.
4. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J 26/PRATEEK KUMAR