COCP-1126 IN THE HI 104 Deepak Hoo Surinder Sin CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. violation of co-ordinate B Hooda vs. St 2. reproduced been compli 3. in complian dated 05.02 1126-2026 -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H COCP Date o k Hooda Versus er Singh Bhoria M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Naveen Kumar, Advocate f Mr. HPS Ishar, Advocate for the Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G. I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present contempt petitio on of order dated 16.01.2026 (A inate Bench of this Court in CRM-M State of Haryana’ whereby it was “xxx xxx 6. Keeping in view the facts a and the prayer made by the pet disposed of with a direc Superintendent of Police, Ro Haryana to take action on (Annexure P-6) of the petitio within a period of four weeks certified copy of this order and Learned counsel for the petition uced above, the order dated 16.01.2 omplied with by the respondent till da Per Contra, learned counsel fo pliance of the order dated 16.01.20 05.02.2026 has been passed by th ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1126-2026 Date of Decision: 13.03.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondent NIDHI GUPTA ocate for for the petitioner. l. A.G. Haryana. petition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-7) passed by a M-1911-2026, titled as ‘Deepak it was directed as under:- xxx ts and circumstances of the case e petitioner, the present petition is irection to respondent No.2- , Rohtak, District Police Lines, on the legal notice 25.12.2025 titioner in accordance with law eeks from the date of receipt of and pass an appropriate order.” petitioner despite the clear direction 6.01.2026 (Annexure P-7) has not till date. sel for the respondent submits that .01.2026 (Annexure P-7), an order by the Superintendent of Police, ging a pak se is es, 25 w of tion not rder lice, RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.13 19:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-1126 Rohtak, dire further subm Superintende incident hav 16.01.2026 survives in th 4. Superintende A copy the petitioner. 5. 6. required to b of, according 7. 8. 13.03.2026 rishu 1126-2026 -2- , directing the ASP HQ, Rohtak, to submitted that the parties have a intendent of Police, Rohtak and docum nt have been sought. It is, therefore, s 2026 (Annexure P-7) stands duly es in the present petition. Copy of order dated 05 intendent of Police, Rohtak handed ov y thereof, has also been supplied Heard. In view of the facts noted ed to be passed in the present petition ordingly. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable , to enquire into the matter. It is ave also been summoned by the documents pertaining to the alleged fore, submitted that the order dated duly complied with and nothing 05.02.2026, passed by the ed over in Court is taken on record. pplied to learned counsel for the above, no further orders are tition; and the same stands disposed any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No It is the ged ated the the are sed RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.13 19:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.