Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13765 (CHH)

RUPESH KUMAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/103/2026 · 2026-01-12

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:1855-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 103 of 2026 Rupesh Kumar S/o Harihar Prasad Aged About 57 Years Office At Haakim Arcade, 2nd Floor, Rear Wing Coffee House Square, Whc Road, Dharampeth, Nagpur, Maharashtra India 440010 Mob 9373289832 ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station, City Kotwali, Tahsil And Distt. Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh 2 - Mukesh Sahu S/o R.C. Sahu Aged About 34 Years R/o Chikhali Ward No. 6, Police Station Chikhali, Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh Mob 9685010003 ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Mr. Ashish Pandey, Advocate For Respondent No.1 /State : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Govt. Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 13.01.2026 1. Heard Mr. A. N. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, learned Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondent No. 1. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA 2 528 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with the following prayers : “I. Quashing and setting aside FIR no. 388/2025 dated 26.07.2025 registered by Kotwali Police Station Rajnandgaon for the offence under section 405, 420, 20(b) r/w 34 of IPC, against the petitioner by allowing this petition, in the interest of justice and equity. II. Pass any other orders deems fit under the circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the charge- sheet has already been filed against the petitioner, therefore, he wants to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to challenge the same. 4. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra