APHC010119772026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] FRIDAY, THE 9th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 981/2026 Between: 1. PEDDI SIVARAMAKRISHNA, S/0 NARASIMHA RAO AGED 56 YEARS R/0 261/1 KRISHNAYAPALEM VILLAGE MANGALAGIRI MANDAL GUNTUR DISTRIETZ ...PETITIONER A N D 1. K SUNITHA GARU IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, EBC WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, PINCODE 522237. 2. PEEYUSH KUMAR GARU IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, PINCODE 522237 3. G BHIMA SANKAR RAO GARU, DIRECTOR (FAC), ECONOMICALLY BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT, 2ND FLOOR, SRI VISHNU TOWERS, KRISHNAVENI SCHOOL ROAD, PORANKI, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court Act, for their willful disobedience of the order of this Honble Court dated 06.01.2026 in W.P. No. 30536 of 2025 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of Copy of Order dated 06.01.2026 in W.P. No. 30536 of 2025 passed by the Hon’ble High Court and to pass SRK, J C.C.No.981 of 2026 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SIVA NAGARJUNA SIDHADAPU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. U KANAKA RAJU The Court made the following: SRK, J C.C.No.981 of 2026 3 O R D E R The Contempt Case has been filed under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 seeking the Court to punish the respondents for willfully and deliberately violating the Order, dated 06.01.2026 passed in Writ Petition No.30536 of 2025. 2. Today, when the matter has come up before this Court, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the orders passed by this Court are complied with, and no further orders are required in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner concurs with the said submission made by the learned counsel for the respondents. 3. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 4. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Contempt Case, shall stand closed. ___ __________ JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY 9th October, 2026. DNB