MOHAMED ASIF UMAR KALUDI v. The District collector
WP/11181/2026 · 2026-04-02
Abdul Quddhose
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13752 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13752 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 11181 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-04-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 11181 of 2026
1. Mohamed Asif Umar Kaludi S/O.Umar Mohammed No.18, Blue Beach Silver sand Hotel East coast Road Mamallapuram Chengalpet District Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The District collector Office of collectorate Chengalpet District 2.The Revenue Divisional officer Chengalpet District Chengalpet 3.The Tahsildhar Thriuporur Taluk Chengalpet District 4.The Assistant Director Survey and land Records Department Chengalpet Chengalpet District Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the 3rd respondent to issue FMB for the petitioners land in S.No.210/49B1, 210/49B2, 210/49B3 and 210/49C2 situated at Nemmili village, Thiruporur Taluk, Chengalpet District by considering the representation dated 11.10.2025 WP No. 11181 of 2026 For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Balu https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 11181 of 2026 For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Arumugam Govt.Advocate For Respondent ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the third respondent to issue FMB for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition in favour of the petitioner within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2. The petitioner has given a representation on 11.10.2025 to the respondents seeking for issuance of FMB for the aforesaid property and since the said representation has not been considered till date, this writ petition has been filed. 3. Mr. S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 4. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 5. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation. 6. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the third respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 11181 of 2026 representation dated 11.10.2025, seeking for issuance of FMB for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition in favour of the petitioner within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs.
02-04-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ab To 1.The District collector Office of collectorate Chengalpet District 2.The Revenue Divisional officer Chengalpet District Chengalpet 3.The Tahsildhar Thriuporur Taluk Chengalpet District 4.The Assistant Director Survey and land Records Department Chengalpet Chengalpet District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 11181 of 2026 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab WP No. 11181 of 2026
02-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis