Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20891 of 2026 Court No. - 49 HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J.
HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J. After some arguments, Shri Shadab Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not wish to press the relief for quashing of the FIR in the writ petition. The relief for quashing of the FIR is accordingly declined. Learned counsel for the petitioner recasts his relief and prays that the petitioner may be granted leave to approach the competent court for anticipatory bail and for seeking appropriate remedies available with him under law. Learned AGA has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. The writ petition is dispose of with the observation that it is always open to the petitioner to avail other legal remedies as may be advised. October 6, 2026 Ashish Tripathi Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shadab Ali Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) (Ajay Bhanot,J.) Mohd. Umar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad