[2026:RJ-JP:30878] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2935/2026 CNR: RJHC020438532026 | URN: CRLMP / 6691U / 2026 Raju Meena S/o Lalaram Meena, R/o Galawas, Police Station Virat Nagar, District Kotputli-Behror, Rajasthan. ----Accused-Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent 2. Mahendra Singh S/o Sher Singh, R/o Bilwari, Police Station Virat Nagar, District Kotputli - Behror, Rajasthan. ----Complainant/Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajdeep Rathore, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. M.S. Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 06/08/2026 1. This criminal misc. petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner for quashing of FIR No.58/2026 registered at Police Station Virat Nagar, District Kotputli-Behror for offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 121(1), 132, 307, 352 and 351(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that bare perusal of the FIR would reveal that no case is made out against the petitioner and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. Counsel submits that petitioner is an agriculturist and the present FIR has been lodged against him because he refused to pay the money allegedly demanded illegally by the complainant. Counsel, therefore, prays that the present petition may be allowed and the impugned FIR may be quashed. [2026:RJ-JP:30878] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2935/2026] 3. Learned State counsel submits that perusal of the FIR would reveal that alleged offences are fully established and as such, no case for quashing of FIR is made out. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Perusal of the FIR would reveal that prima facie, contents of FIR discloses commission of cognizable offences against the petitioner and investigation is still pending and the case of the petitioner is not covered by the guidelines prescribed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. versus Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. reported in AIR 1992 SC 604. Learned counsel for the petitioner has failed to satisfy this Court as to existence of any such exceptional or attending circumstance under which, even if the FIR discloses commission of a cognizable offence, it can be quashed. 6. Therefore, in facts and circumstances of the case, the allegations levelled by the complainant in the FIR are required to be investigated by the Investigation Agency. Thus, this Court does not find a good ground to quash the FIR against the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the present Cr. Misc. Petition is hereby dismissed. 8. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand dismissed. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J 38/MADAN