Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13745 (CAL)

UTPAL HALDER v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

WPA/29019/2024 · 2026-02-05

Saugata Bhattacharyya

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1. 1. (DL) (DL) 05.02.2026 05.02.2026 Ct. No. 02 (ARPAN) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) W.P.A. 29019 OF 2024 UTPAL HALDER VS. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS Mr. Debasish Kundu, Adv. Mr. Bidan Modak, Adv. Ms. Arpita Kundu, Adv. …for the Petitioner Mr. Ram Chandra Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Ashok Prasad, Adv. Mr. Tapan Bhanja, Adv. …for the Union of India 1. Matter has come up in the list under the heading ‘To Be Mentioned’ on being mentioned by the learned advocate representing the petitioner. 2. Learned advocate representing the petitioner submits that petitioner does not want to proceed with the matter and in support of the same a letter which the learned advocate has received from the petitioner is placed before this Court and same is taken on record. 3. Union of India is represented by learned advocates. 4. In view of submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, writ petition stands dismissed on the ground of non-prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 2 6. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. (SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.)