Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13743 (CHH)

NEMI CHAND NAHAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/522/2026 · 2026-02-05

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:6792-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 522 of 2026 Nemi Chand Nahar S/o Late Shri Chunni Lalji Nahar Aged About 79 Years R/o 1- Jk Vila Malviya Nagar, Durg District Durg Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Durg District Durg Chhattisgarh 3 - Chief Executive Officer Chhattisgarh Rural Road Development Agency Civil Lines Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - Chief Executive Officer Jila Panchayat Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh 5 - Finance Controller Chhattisgarh Rural Road Development Agency Civil Lines Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 6 - Superintending Engineer Project Circle Durg, Chhattisgarh Rural Road Development Agency District Durg Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondents No.1, 2 and 6 : Mr.P.K.Bhaduri, Deputy Advocate General Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Digitally signed by BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Date: 2026.02.07 10:18:26 +0530 2 Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 6 .2 .2026 1. Case is called out. None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the instant writ petition. However, Mr.P.K.Bhaduri, learned Deputy Advocate General appearing for respondents No.1, 2 and 6/State, is present. 2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent no. 2 to refund the undisputed Additional Performance Security (APS) of Rs. 21.04 lakh to the petitioner forthwith as per terms of the contract and clause 40 of the Standard Bidding Documents (SBD) with 18% interest from completion of the work until the date of actual refund, within stipulated time, in the interest of justice. 10.2 Any other relief which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted.” 3. The petitioner has also filed writ petition being WPC No.415/2026 with following reliefs:- "10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent no. 2 to refund the undisputed Additional Performance Security (APS) of Rs. 25.13 lakh to the petitioner forthwith as per terms of the contract and clause 40 of the Standard Bidding Documents (SBD) with 18% interest from completion of the work until the date of actual refund, within stipulated time, in the interest of justice. 3 10.2 Any other relief which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted." 4. The aforesaid writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner, without any liberty, vide order dated 2.2.2026. 5. Today when the case is called out, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition. 6. It transpires that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the matter. 7. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed on this ground alone. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Bablu