Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13742 (KAR)

M/S VALSALA TRAVELS PVT LTD. v. SRI B V RAVIKUMAR

CRL.RP/503/2026 · 2026-04-24

V Srishananda

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22814 CRL.RP No. 503 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 503 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. M/S VALSALA TRAVELS PVT. LTD., CORPORATE OFFICE AT SURVEY NO.2/5, SAJJEPALYA SRIGANDADAKAVALU VISHWANEEDAM POST MAGADI ROAD BENGALURU - 560091 2. SRI K. DINESH S/O LATE A.P. ANANDAN AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY OF M/S. VALSALA TRAVELS PVT. LTD., CORPORATE OFFICE AT SURVEY NO.2/5 SAJJEPALYA SRIGANDADAKAVALU VISHWANEEDAM POST MAGADI ROAD, BENGALURU 560091. .. PETITIONERS (BY SRI. R KUMAR., ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. B. V. RAVIKUMAR S/O LATE K. VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT NO. 4252 PHONEX -1 Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22814 CRL.RP No. 503 of 2026 TOWER-4, BENGALURU WEST DR. RAJKUMAR ROAD, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560010. .. RESPONDENTS THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S. 397 R/W 401 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT DATED 05.11.2025 PASSED BY THE LX ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1878/2024 AND ALSO THE JUDGMENT PASSED BY THE XXIII ADDL.CJM BANGALORE IN CC NO.37195/2022 DATED 01.07.2024 CONVICTING THE APPELLANT FOR AN OFFENCES P/U/S 138 OF N.I ACT AND SENTENCING HIM TO PAY OF FINE RS.35,00,000/- AND IN DEFAULT OF PAYMENT OF FINE TO UNDERGO SIMPLE IMPRISONMENT FOR A PERIOD OF 6 MONTHS AND THEREBY DISMISS THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE RESPONDENT AGAINST THE PETITIONERS IN CC NO.37195/2022. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo reporting the death of petitioner No.2 who was the only authorised signatory of petitioner No.1/company. As such, as of now there is nobody who would represent petitioner No.2. 2. Noting the same, petition is dismissed as abated. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE GJM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 12