Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010153682026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C)/975/2026 BHABESH DAS S/O LATE NAREN CHANDRA DAS R/O PANDU SADILAPUR RIVER SIDE SWAHID PARAG DAS PATH P.O. PANDU P.S. JALUKBARI GUWAHATI PIN 781012 KAMRUP (M) ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AD 10 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI PIN 781006 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI 781006 3:THE DIT. COMMISSIONER KAMRUP (M) GUWAHATI 4:THE ADDL. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (REVENUE) KAMRUP (M) GUWAHATI. Page No.# 2/4 5:THE CIRCLE OFFICER GUWAHATI REVENUE CIRCLE DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM. 6:MINTU DAS S/O LATE RAMESH CH. DAS R/O PANDU SADILAPUR KALI MANDIR NEAR SARAIGHAT BRIDGE P.O. PANDU P.S. JALUKBARI GUWAHATI PIN 781012 KAMRUP (M) ASSAM. 7:NABA KUMAR BARMAN S/O LATE GOLOK BARMAN R/O PANDU SADILAPUR RIVER SIDE SWAHID PARAG DAS PATH P.O. PANDU P.S. JALUKBARI GUWAHATI PIN 781012 KAMRUP (M) ASSAM. 8:PRANAB KUMAR BARMAN S/O LATE GOLOK BARMAN R/O PANDU SADILAPUR RIVER SIDE SWAHID PARAG DAS PATH P.O. PANDU P.S. JALUKBARI GUWAHATI PIN 781012 KAMRUP (M) ASSAM. 9:BIPUL DAS S/O LATE UMA RAM DAS R/O PANDU SADILAPUR KALI MANDIR NEAR SARAIGHAT BRIDGE P.O. PANDU P.S. JALUKBARI
Page No.# 3/4 GUWAHATI PIN 781012 KAMRUP (M) ASSAM. 10:RONGOLI BARMAN W/O LATE TARKESWAR DAS R/O PANDU SADILAPUR RIVER SIDE SWAHID PARAG DAS PATH P.O. PANDU P.S. JALUKBARI GUWAHATI PIN 781012 KAMRUP (M) ASSAM. 11:RENU DAS C/O GAUTAM DAS R/O PANDU SADILAPUR RIVER SIDE SWAHID PARAG DAS PATH P.O. PANDU P.S. JALUKBARI GUWAHATI PIN 781012 KAMRUP (M) ASSAM. Advocate for the petitioner(s): Mr. I Choudhury
Advocate for the respondent(s): Ms. M Barman Junior Govt. Advocate, Assam
B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER 28.08.2026
Page No.# 4/4 Mr. I Choudhury, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submits that the instant writ petition has become infructuous in view of the passing of the order dated 29.06.2026 as well as the subsequent action so taken including the filing of the writ petition being WP(C)No.3889/2026. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, submits that the writ petition may be closed as infructuous without prejudice to the writ petitioner in WP(C)No.3889/2026. 3. Taking into account the above, the writ petition stands closed as infructuous.
However, the closure of the writ petition as infructuous shall not prejudice the writ petitioner in WP(C)No.3889/2026. 4. Interim order passed, if any, stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant