HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 16514 of 2026 Court No. - 72 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard, Learned counsel for the applicant, Learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 51 of 2026, under Sections 351(2), 352, 115(2), 109(1) of B.N.S., Police Station- Anoopshahr, District- Bulandshahr. 3. The Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant is although named in the F.I.R., no specific role has been given to him. The injured during investigation have filed their affidavits before the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Bulandshahr, clearly denying the presence of the applicant at the place of incident. The applicant has no criminal antecedents and he is in jail since 29.3.2026. 4. The Learned A.G.A., on the other hand, has opposed the prayer for grant of bail and has contended that the applicant is named in the F.I.R. The role of applicant is of assaulting the injured Priyanshu, using a knife. The injured in their statements have also assigned the role of using a knife to the applicant. 5. I have considered the submissions made by the Learned counsels for the parties and perused the material brought on the record. 6. The applicant is in jail since 29.3.2026. The investigation is said to be Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jyoti Agrawal, Nitin Kumar Agrawal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Anand .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) pending. The injured and the informant have both filed their affidavits, claiming that the applicant was not present at the spot. 7. Taking into account the entire facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the injured and the informant have both filed their affdiavits and have denied the presence of the applicant without resiling from the prosecution version, prima facie, a case for bail is made out. 8. The bail application is allowed. 9. Let the accused-applicant- Anand, involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions: i. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. iii. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. iv. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted by the court concerned. 10. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail. 11. It is made clear that the applicant shall be released on the basis of computer generated copy of this order, downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad and verified by the concerned counsel with the undertaking that the certified copy will be filed within 15 days. 12. It is further directed that the trial court shall send the release order to the concerned jail through Bail Order Management System (BOMS) to ensure early release of the applicant. 13. The observations made hereinabove are exclusively for deciding the BAIL No. 16514 of 2026 2 instant bail application and are not to be considered to be an opinion on the merits of the case. May 14, 2026 Vandana BAIL No. 16514 of 2026 3 (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- VANDANA GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad