Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13736 (PNJ)

SUNITA v. PARVEEN

CR/9051/2025 · 2026-03-06

Meenakshi I Mehta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

105+210 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM No.3176-CII of 2026 in/and CR No.9051 of 2025 Date of Decision: 06.03.2026 Sunita …Petitioner Versus Parveen …Applicant-Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Present:- Mr. Ram Avtar Sheoran, Advocate for the non-applicant/petitioner. Mr. Arpandeep Narula, Advocate and Mr. Anubhav Jakhar, Advocate for the applicant-respondent. ***** MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J. (Oral) CM No.3176-CII of 2026 This application has been moved on behalf of the applicant- respondent for seeking dismissal of the main revision-petition bearing CR No.9051 of 2025 on account of its having been rendered infructuous in view of the order passed by the Court below on 20.01.2026 on the application moved by the non-applicant/petitioner under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC. Notice in the application. Learned counsel for non-applicant/petitioner accepts notice and he admits the factum of dismissal of the afore-referred application as moved by his client under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC and further submits that he NEETU RANI 2026.03.07 15:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD CR No.9051 of 2025 (O&M) -2- has no objection in allowing the present application with liberty to the non- applicant/petitioner to avail the appropriate remedy, as may be permissible to her under law, to challenge the above-mentioned order dated 20.01.2026. Learned counsel for the applicant-respondent has no objection to the afore-said submission as made by learned counsel for the non- applicant/petitioner. Resultantly, the application in hand is, hereby, allowed. CR No.9051 of 2025 Dismissed for having been rendered infructuous, with the liberty to the non-applicant/petitioner to avail the appropriate remedy, as may be permissible to her under law (if any), to lay challenge to the above- mentioned order dated 20.01.2026. 06.03.2026 (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) neetu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether Reportable: No NEETU RANI 2026.03.07 15:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD