Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010172482026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : CRP/164/2026 DHRUBAJYOTI SARMA AND 5 ORS. SON OF LATE HAREN SARMA, RESIDENT OF WARD NO. 6, TENGABARI, MANGALDAI TOWN, MOUZA- CHAPAI, P.O. AND P.S.- MANGALDAI, DISTRICT- DARRANG, ASSAM 2: PANKAJ SARMA SON OF LATE HAREN SARMA RESIDENT OF WARD NO. 6 TENGABARI MANGALDAI TOWN MOUZA- CHAPAI P.O. AND P.S.- MANGALDAI DISTRICT- DARRANG ASSAM 3: RENU DEVI DAUGHTER OF LATE HAREN SARMA RESIDENT OF WARD NO. 6 TENGABARI MANGALDAI TOWN MOUZA- CHAPAI P.O. AND P.S.- MANGALDAI DISTRICT- DARRANG ASSAM 4: RITA DEVI DAUGHTER OF LATE HAREN SARMA RESIDENT OF WARD NO. 6 TENGABARI MANGALDAI TOWN MOUZA- CHAPAI P.O. AND P.S.- MANGALDAI DISTRICT- DARRANG ASSAM Page No.# 2/4 5: DHARANI SARMA SON OF LATE HIREN SARMA RESIDENT OF WARD NO. 6 TENGABARI MANGALDAI TOWN MOUZA- CHAPAI P.O. AND P.S.- MANGALDAI DISTRICT- DARRANG ASSAM 6: KHAGEN SARMA SON OF LATE HIREN SARMA RESIDENT OF WARD NO. 6 TENGABARI MANGALDAI TOWN MOUZA- CHAPAI P.O. AND P.S.- MANGALDAI DISTRICT- DARRANG ASSA VERSUS JOGEN SARMA @ JOGEN CHANDRA SARMA @ JOGENDRA CHANDRA SARMA SON OF LATE RABIDEV SARMA, RESIDENT OF WARD NO. 6, TENGABARI, MOUZA- CHAPAI, P.O. AND P.S.- MANGALDAI, DISTRICT- DARRANG, ASSAM, PIN CODE- 784125 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B K SEN, MS. S KHATUN,F. SHAHIN,P SINGH,MS. T SOM,MR A HUSSAIN Advocate for the Respondent : MR. N CHAKRABORTY (FOR CAVEATOR), B R SAH (FOR CAVEATOR),MR C GOSWAMI (FOR CAVEATOR) Page No.# 3/4 :: BEFORE :: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA O R D E R 07.09.2026 Heard Mr. B.K. Sen, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. C. Goswami, the learned counsel for the caveator. 2. This is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 01.07.2026 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.) No.1, Darrang, Mangaldai Title Execution Case No.08/1994. 3. The petitioners are the judgment debtors in the aforesaid case. They filed a petition under Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure raising some objections. In the said proceeding, the trial court had passed the impugned order. 4. Today, Mr. C. Goswami has submitted that after passing of the impugned order, the trial court had passed another order on 29.08.2026 and this order has not been challenged in this revision petition. 5. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsels of both sides. 6. The order dated 29.08.2026 is a continuation of the impugned order. Therefore, the petitioners have to challenge the latest order i.e. the order dated 29.08.2026. 7. Therefore, instead of challenging the order dated 01.07.2026, the petitioners are advised to challenge the latest order i.e. the order 29.08.2026. With the aforesaid direction, the revision petition is disposed of. Liberty is Page No.# 4/4 granted to a file a fresh petition. JUDGE Comparing Assistant