Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13734 (PNJ)

LAKHVIR SINGH & ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/5383/2026 · 2026-05-08

Manisha Batra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-5383 IN THE (112 ) LAKHVIR S STATE OF P CORAM: Present: MANISHA B 1. the Constituti directing the o of the petitione on their repres 2. submitted tha 05.05.2026 b (Annexure P petition but th taken thereon. 5383-2026 (O&M) (1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH Da IR SINGH & ANOTHER Versus OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MA Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, Advocate f Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior D ****  HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been file stitution of India seeking issuance the official respondents No.1 to 3 to etitioners at the hands of respondents N representation dated 05.05.2026 (Anne At the very outset, learned coun d that the petitioners have recently 26 before the Senior Superinten re P-3) raising their grievances as but the same has not yet been conside ereon. He further submitted that at this JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRWP-5383-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 08.05.2026 ... Petitioners ...Respondents E MANISHA BATRA  ocate for the petitioners nior DAG, Punjab en filed under Article 226/227 of suance of a writ of mandamus to 3 to protect the life and liberty ents No.5 to 13 and to take action (Annexure P-3). d counsel for the petitioners has cently filed a representation on erintendent of Police, Sangrur es as mentioned in the present onsidered and no action has been at this stage, the petitioners AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.08 14:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-5383 would be satis Senior Super representation 3. 4. notice on beha be done in due her during the 5. commenting a disposed of at aforesaid rep petitioners wit order in accord petitioners, the in order to pro  08.05.2026 Amit Sharma 5383-2026 (O&M) (2) e satisfied if appropriate directions are Superintendent of Police, Sangrur tation filed by the petitioners and take Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior n behalf of the respondents-State and s in due course. Let a complete set of th ng the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer mad ting anything on the merits of the c of at this stage with a direction to res d representation dated 05.05.2026 rs within a period of 15 days from to accordance with law. Needless to say, rs, the official respondents would pro to protect their life and liberty. Whether speaking/reasoned:    ons are issued to respondent No.2- angrur to decide the aforesaid d take necessary action thereon. enior DAG, Punjab, has advance e and submits that the needful will et of the paperbook be supplied to r made by the petitioners, without f the case, the present petition is to respondent No.2 to decide the .2026 (Annexure P-3) of the rom today, by passing a speaking to say, if any threat is found to the ld provide them adequate security (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE  ned:- Yes/No   AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.08 14:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.