M/S OLYMPIC SPORTING COMPANY v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/6886/2026 · 2026-03-03
Sachin Shankar Magadum
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1373 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1373 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12904 WP No. 6886 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 6886 OF 2026 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN:
M/S. OLYMPIC SPORTING COMPANY, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.3, 1ST FLOOR, THIMMAIAH CHAMBERS, GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 009.
REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER, SRI. NIKHIL B. VATSAL, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, S/O. BAKTAVATSAL REG: UNDER KARNATAKA SHOPS AND COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS ACT, 1961. …PETITIONER (BY DR. PRAJWAL K. ARADHYA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. S. KALYAN BASAVARAJ, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH EMPOWERMENT AND SPORTS, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001.
2.
THE COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH, EMPOWERMENT AND SPORTS, STATE YOUTH CENTRE, N.T. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. Digitally signed by SOWMYA DODDAMARAIAH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12904 WP No. 6886 of 2026
3.
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH EMPOWERMENT AND SPORTS, STATE YOUTH CENTRE, N.T. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001.
4.
THE JOINT DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH EMPOWERMENT AND SPORTS, STATE YOUTH CENTRE, N.T. ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001.
5.
M/S. AMITCO KHEL CENTRE, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 65, SARASWATI MANDIR, SURAJ KUND RD, SURAJ KUND, DEVI NAGAR, MEERUT, UTTAR PRADESH - 250001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA FOR R1 TO R4;
V/O. DATED 02.03.2026, NOTICE TO R5 IS DEFERRED TILL NEXT DATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE ACTION OF THE RESPONDENT NO. 2 EVALUATING, AND ACCEPTING THE FINANCIAL/COMMERCIAL BID OF THE RESPONDENT NO. 5 BEARING BID NO. B6278637 OF THE TENDER NOTIFICATION BEARING REF. NO. DYES/2025-26/IND0089, PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12904 WP No. 6886 of 2026 ORAL ORDER The captioned petition is filed challenging the action of respondent No.2 in evaluating and accepting the commercial bid of respondent No.5 bearing Bid No.B6278637 pursuant to the tender notification bearing Ref. No.DYES/2025-26/IND0089. The petitioner has also sought a writ of mandamus directing respondent No.2 to forthwith re-verify the eligibility documents of respondent No.5 in terms of the petitioner’s representation dated 11.02.2026 and consequently to consider the petitioner’s representation/objection dated 20.02.2026.
2. Learned AGA, on instructions, has filed a memo today and produced documents indicating that the work order dated 12.02.2026 has already been issued by the department in favour of respondent No.5. The respondent has also produced
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12904 WP No. 6886 of 2026 the registration certificate of establishment of respondent No.5 along with copies of the work orders earlier issued in favour of respondent No.5. Referring to these documents and particularly to the fact that the work order has already been issued, learned AGA submits that the present writ petition is not maintainable and that the petitioner has an efficacious alternative remedy under Section 16 of the Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurements Act, 1999.
3. Having regard to the fact that the work
order has already been issued and in view of the availability of an alternative statutory remedy under Section 16 of the Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurements Act, 1999, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner has to be relegated to avail the said remedy.
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12904 WP No. 6886 of 2026 Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy under Section 16 of the Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurements Act, 1999. All contentions are kept open. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE DS CT:TSM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 15