Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13728 (ALL)

BRIJMANI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 13 OTHERS

WRIB/3419/2026 · 2026-10-08

Ashutosh Srivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 3419 of 2026 Court No. - 50 HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that he does not wish to press the writ petition and shall abide by the directions given by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, concerned, under the order impugned dated 30.04.2026 and shall file a Revision under Section 48 (3) of the Act, assailing the order of the Consolidation Officer dated 26.02.2021, passed under Section 42-A of the UPCH Act. In the eventuality of filing a Revision under Section 48 (3) of the UPCH Act, by the petitioner, before the Deputy Director of Consolidation, the Deputy Director of Consolidation is directed to entertain and decide the said Revision on merits and appropriate orders shall be passed within a period of three months. This order has been passed in the presence of Shri Shravan Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the contesting respondents. With the aforesaid observations the writ petition is disposed off. October 9, 2026 Deepak/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alauddin, Fakhruddin Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Kumar Gupta, Shrawan Kumar Tripathi (Ashutosh Srivastava,J.) Brijmani .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 13 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- DEEPAK KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad