Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13725 (JHR)

PANCHU RAJWAR ALIAS PACHU RAJWAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2540/2026 · 2026-03-30

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:8993] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.2540 of 2026 ------ Panchu Rajwar @ Pachu Rajwar, aged 19 years, son of Late Sukhna Rajwar, resident of Kamalpur, Jampur, P.O. & P.S.- Barharwa, District- Sahibganj. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate For the State : Md. Fahad Allam, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-30-03-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Barhait P.S. Case No. 189 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 96 of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner procured a minor victim girl for solemnizing marriage with her. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that in the statement under Section 180 of the B.N.S.S., 2023, the victim has categorically has stated that she went voluntarily with the petitioner and was residing in his house. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-20 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 04.12.2025 as is evident from para-21 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner also undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Sahibganj in connection with Barhait P.S. Case No. 189 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 30.03.2026 Saroj/