[2026:JHHC:8558] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.937 of 2026 ------ Ali @ Mohammad Shah @ Md. Ali Shah, aged about 24 Year, S/o Niyat Saha, R/o Vill- Mankueri, P.O. & P.S. – Chainpur, District- Palamau, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sheo Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State : Ms. Vandana Bharti, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.03 Dated- 26-03-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection Chhattarpur P.S. Case No.91 of 2025 (S.T. No.335 of 2025) registered for the offences punishable under Section 126 (2), 127 (2), 115 (2), 117 (2), 109, 352, 351 (2), 326 (f) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 and 35 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner set the Hywa vehicle on fire and thereby attempted to murder the driver of the said vehicle. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted no one has sustained any injury in the alleged occurrence. It is further submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. yet without putting him on Test Identification Parade, charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. It is next submitted that charge has not yet been framed in this case. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, have already been admitted to bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 04.09.2025 passed in B.A. No.6864 of 2025. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 20.06.2025 as has been mentioned in para-12 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge VIII, Daltonganj at Palamau in connection with Chhattarpur P.S. Case No.91 of 2025 (S.T. No.335 of 2025) with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated- 26.03.2026-Animesh/