Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13709 (CHH)

HIRA SINGH KURREY v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/224/2026 · 2026-01-18

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:2974 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 224 of 2026 1 - Hira Singh Kurrey S/o Late Shri Bisru Kurrey Aged About 55 Years Through Power Of Attorney Petitioner No. 02, R/o Village- Tekari, Tahsil- Dharsiwa, District- Raipur, C.G. 2 - Premsingh Kurrey S/o Late Shri Bisru Kurrey Aged About 54 Years R/o Village- Tekari, Tahsil- Dharsiwa, District- Raipur, C.G. 3 - Uttam Kumar Kurrey S/o Late Shri Bisru Kurrey Aged About 48 Years Through Power Of Attorney Petitioner No. 02, R/o Village- Tekari, Tahsil- Dharsiwa, District- Raipur, C.G. 4 - Smt. Usha Bai D/o Late Shri Bisru Kurrey Aged About 44 Years Through Power Of Attorney Petitioner No. 02, R/o Village- Tekari, Tahsil- Dharsiwa, District- Raipur, C.G. 5 - Smt. Ramshila Devi Kurrey W/o Late Shri Bisru Kurrey Aged About 69 Years Through Power Of Attorney Petitioner No. 02, R/o Village- Tekari, Tahsil- Dharsiwa, District- Raipur, C.G. ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Raipur, Distt. Raipur, C.G. 3 - Tahsildar Dharsiwa, District- Raipur, C.G. 4 - Smt. Dashribai D/o Late Shri Firangi Satnami Aged About 72 Years R/o Village- Tekari, Tahsil- Dharsiwa, District- Raipur, C.G. ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Aniruddha Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents 1 to 4/ State : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP Date: 2026.01.20 18:01:52 +0530 2 (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 19.01.2026 1. The petitioners have preferred this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following relief(s):- 10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records from the respondent No.3 which relates to passing of the orders impugned dated 10.12.2025 for kind perusal of this Hon’ble Court. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ by quashing the impugned orders dated 10.12.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by Learned Tahsildar Dharsiwa, Distt. Raipur (CG) 10.3 Any other relief as this Hon’ble Court may deems fit looking to the facts and circumstances of the case may also be awarded. 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw this petition. 3. On due consideration, prayer is allowed and learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition. 4. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Bini