Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13708 (KAR)

NARAYANAPPA v. SRINIVASA. A. G.

MFA/2873/2025 · 2026-03-14

Lok Adalath

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 CONCILIATORS PRESENT HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU & SMT. H.R. RENUKA, MEMBER M.F.A.No.2873 OF 2025 (Lok Adalat No.1230/2026) BETWEEN NARAYANAPPA S/O. LATE CHIKKATHIMMAIAH DEAD BY LRS 1. ROOPA W/O. LATE NARAYANAPPA NOW AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS 2. MADHUSUDHAN N. S/O. LATE NARAYANAPPA NOW AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS 3. YOGESH S/O. LATE NARAYANAPPA NOW AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS 4. KEMPAMMA W/O. LATE CHIKKA THIMMAIAH NOW AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT K. S. PALYA, KASABA HOBLI GUBBI TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT Digitally signed by DEEPU M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 2 APPELLANT NO.3 IS MINOR REP. BY HIS N/G AND MOTHER APPELLANT NO.1 APPELLANT NOS.1 TO 3 ARE R/AT CHIKKANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI GUBBI TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT. ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI RAGHU R., ADVOCATE) AND 1. SRINIVASA A. G. S/O. GANGADHARACHAR NOW AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT ADALAGERE VILLAGE NITTUR HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK TUMAKURU DISTRICT AND ALSO R/AT NO.35/1, 6TH CROSS ST. LORENCE SCHOOL BYATHARAYANAPURA MYSURU ROAD BENGALURU-560 026 2. THE MANAGER ACKO GEN. INS. LTD. REP. BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER MANISHA PUROHIT, NO.36/5 HUSTIEHUB ONE EAST, SOMASANDRAPALYA 27TH MAIN ROAD, SECTOR-2 HSR LAYOUT BENGALURU-560 102 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI ANUP SEETHARAM RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) 3 THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, PRAYING TO CALL FOR TCR AND TO MODIFY AND ENHANCE THE AWARD AMOUNT PASSED IN MVC NO.1547/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF THE VII ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE AND MEMBER, MACT AT TUMAKURU, VIDE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 23/11/2024 AND ALLOW THIS APPEAL WITH COSTS THROUGHOUT. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER 1. Learned Counsel appearing for the Appellants / Claimants is present. Learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No.2 / Insurance Company along with its representative are present. 2. After detailed negotiations, the matter has been settled between the parties. A joint memo signed by the learned Advocate appearing for the appellants/claimants (being authorized by the appellants/claimants to sign) and the learned Advocate appearing for respondent No.2/Insurance Company and an authorized officer has been filed. The appellants/claimants have agreed to receive and respondent No.2/Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.2,80,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Eighty Thousand), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 4 3. Respondent No.2 / Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4. The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellants/claimants in equal proportion, on proper identification. 5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly and shall be communicated to the Tribunal for appropriate action at the earliest. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER KS