ANIL MANDAL @ ANIL KUMAR MANDAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./4543/2026 · 2026-05-26
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13696 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13696 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:15518 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B. A. No. 4543 of 2026
--- Anil Mandal @ Anil Kumar Mandal … … Petitioner(s)
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… … Opposite Party(s)
---
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
---
For the Petitioner(s)
: Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate
For the Opposite Party(s) : A.P.P.
---
2/26.05.2026 Heard Mr. Pran Pranay learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner is an accused in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No. 17 of 2026.
The petitioner and other accused persons were apprehended by the police and from their possession, mobiles and SIMs were recovered. They were suspected to be involved in Cyber Crime.
Submissions has been advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner that no victim has come forward to lodge any complaint. It has further been submitted that the petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 31.01.2026.
Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Regard being had to the above, the petitioner above named is
directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-Cum-Cyber Crime, Special Court at Deoghar in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No. 17 of 2026 subject to the condition that one of the bailors should be close relative of the petitioner.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J) 26th May, 2026. Simran/-