Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13694 (GAU)

Sh. Nothawnga and Anr. v. The State of Mizoram and 5 Ors.

WP(C)/132/2026 · 2026-09-07

Nelson Sailo

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC030006622026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/132/2026 Sh. Nothawnga and Anr. S/o Tawkduna, R/o Pangkhua - 796810, Lawngtlai District, Mizoram 2: Sh. Lalrinchunga S/o Hrechina R/o Pangkhua - 796810 Lawngtlai District Mizora VERSUS The State of Mizoram and 5 Ors. R/b the Secretary to the Govt. of Mizoram, Land Revenue and Settlement Department Aizawl - 796001 2:The Director Land Revenue and Settlement Department Aizawl - 796001 3:The Union of India R/b the Secretary Ministry of Defense 101-A South Block New Delhi - 110011 4:The District Collector Lawngtlai District Lawngtlai - 796891 5:The Chief Engineer Project Pushpak Aizawl - 796017 Page No.# 2/2 6:The Executive Engineer (Civil) Officer Commanding 74 Road Construction Company (GREF) - 930074 C/o 99 AP Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. F. Lalengliana, Sr. Adv. Advocate for the Respondent : Addl. AG/GA, Mizoram for R 1, 2 & 4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO JUDGMENT / ORDER Date : 08.09.2026 Mr. Lalruatfela Chawngthu, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there are some technical defects in the writ petition and therefore he prays that the he may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh. In view of above, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh, if so advised. JUDGE Comparing Assistant