Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13685 (PAT)

Kunal Kumar Singh @ Kunal Singh v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./31145/2026 · 2026-05-12

Ashok Kumar Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31145 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2024 Thana- Lokha District- Supaul ====================================================== Kunal Kumar Singh @ Kunal Singh S/O Ratan Kumar Singh R/O Vill.- Baruari West Ward no. 5, P.S. and Dist.- Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 12-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Laukaha P.S. Case No.12 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 327, 427, 384, 386 & 506 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner has made 2-3 fires at one Vivek Kumar Singh @Mausam Kumar Singh due to land dispute. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that there is also a counter version of this case. Learned counsel has submitted that from perusal of the injury report of Vivek Kumar Singh it is clear that he has received entry wound at right lateral chest wall. Learned counsel Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31145 of 2026(2) dt.12-05-2026 2/2 for the petitioner has submitted that there is also fracture antero lateral aspect of 5th rib and posterior aspect of 9th rib. 5. On being asked whether the petitioner has received any injury or not, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner has not received any injury. 6. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State. He has submitted that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of seven cases. 7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage, however, he may renew his prayer for bail after six months, if the trial is not concluded. Learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial. durgesh/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T