Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13685 (BOM)

ISMAIL CHANDSO MUJAWAR v. SANDESH TADVI

CP/319/2019 · 2026-09-29

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(1) 908- C.P. 319-2019.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO. 319 OF 2019 IN WP/2506/2017 ISMAIL CHANDSO MUJAWAR VERSUS SANDESH TADVI ….. Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. C. R. More h/f Mr. Gautam J. Pahilwan AGP for Respondents: Mr. G. A. Kulkarni ….. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 29, 2026 ORDER:- 1. Though the learned counsel holding for Mr. Pahilwan, for the petitioner, requested to issue notice to respondent, but it appears that the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting the matter and he did not even circulate the matter after 2019. The directions appears to be for appointing the petitioner as “Mutawali” of Wakf Institution “ Dargah Haji Mohammed Hazrat Mohammed Sahab R.H. situated at Mouje Kondi Tq. & Dist. Solapur under the orders of Wakf Tribunal, Aurangabad. 2. However, considering the conduct of the petitioner, we are not inclined to grant any direction in this matter, as the petitioner himself (2) 908- C.P. 319-2019.odt is found highly negligent in prosecuting the matter. As such, the petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE YSK/