Page No.# 1/2 GAHC030003952026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/113/2026 Smt. Rozamliani D/o Varthantluangi (L), R/o Kulikawn, Aizawl, Mizoram - 796005 VERSUS Smt. Lalrinmawii Varte and Anr. D/o Taikhuma, R/o Khatla, Aizawl, Mizoram 2:Smt. Vanneihpuii D/o Kapbuanga (L) R/o Dawrpui Aizawl Mizora Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr C Lalramzauva Sr. Adv. Advocate for the Respondent : Mr B Lalramenga for R2 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO O R D E R 08.09.2026 Heard Mr. C. Lalramzauva, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. Stephen Lalbuatsaiha, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that in terms of the Court’s order dated 16.06.2026, the applicant has served notice upon the respondents by way of Dasti. Mr. C. Lalramzauva, learned Page No.# 2/2 senior counsel submits that after serving notice by Dasti, the applicant has filed an affidavit incorporating the acknowledgement receipt from the respondents. Accordingly, notice is accepted to be complete upon the respondents. At this stage, Mr. B. Lalramenga, learned counsel submits that he has instructions to appear on behalf of respondent No.2 and submits that he has no objection if the delay is condoned. No one appears for respondent No.1 despite service of notice. On the other hand, it is seen that the delay sought to be condoned is only for 05(five) days. Having regard to the statements made in the application, the Court is inclined to condone the delay of 05(five) days in preferring the connected appeal. It is ordered accordingly. The interlocutory application stands disposed of. Registry shall register the connected appeal and list the appeal in the admission column on 17.09.2026. JUDGE Comparing Assistant