( 2026:HHC:11443 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Ex. Petition No.95 of 2026 Decided on: 9th April, 2026 Mijraj Kumar .......Petitioner versus State of H.P and others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr.Arun Rana, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr.Amandeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral) The petitioner, by way of present execution petition, has sought the execution of the directions issued by this Court in CWP No.13435 of 2025, titled, Mijraj Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, decided on 22.08.2025. This Court had given the direction to decide the representation of the petitioner in the light of judgment dated 23.06.2025 passed in CWP No.8032 of 2021, titled, Vikas Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, within a period four weeks. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. ( 2026:HHC:11443 ) 2 2. The respondents have placed on record copy of office order dated 12.12.2025, passed by the Director, Higher Education, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-1. Since there was only direction to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, which stands rejected, no further orders are required to be passed by this Court. 3. In view of this, the execution petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. However, the petitioner is at liberty to assail the order dated 12.12.2025 by taking recourse to the appropriate remedy available to him under law. 4. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) April 09, 2026 Judge (naveen)