Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13679 (ALL)

TANNU YADAV AND ANOTHER v. PHOOLMATI DEVI AND 3 OTHERS

A227/14306/2026 · 2026-10-08

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 14306 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "i- to direct the The Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Mau to decide the M.А.С.Р. по. 38 of 2025 (Tannu Yadav and another Vs. Phoolmati Devi and others) under section 166 of The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 pending before The Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Mau within stipulated period." 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that Motor Accident Claims Petition is pending consideration since 2025 before Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mau. The sole prayer is for early disposal of the said case. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, or calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to the private respondent, the matter is being disposed of, at the admission stage, with a direction upon court concerned to decide the pending Motor Accident Claims Petition No.38 of 2025, after hearing all the concerned parties, strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merits. October 9, 2026 SK Goswami Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shivam Kumar Modanwal Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Tannu Yadav And Another .....Petitioner(s) Phoolmati Devi And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad