Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13677 (ALL)

OM PRAKASH YADAV v. SANJEEV KUMAR ARORA

A227/14062/2026 · 2026-10-05

Vikram D Chauhan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 14062 of 2026 Court No. - 55 HON'BLE VIKRAM D. CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present petition is filed with the following prayer:- "A) Issue a order or direction to the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 10, Allahabad to proceed with and decide Complaint Case no. 2573 of 2024 (Om Prakash Yadav Vs. Sanjeev Arora) under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 pending before the learned court below, expeditiously and within the time period fixed by this Hon'ble Court, subject to the cooperation of the parties and without granting unnecessary adjournments." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the proceedings before the court concerned be directed to be concluded in a time bound manner. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is complainant. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 10, Allahabad to decide the Complaint Case No. 2573 of 2024 (Om Prakash Yadav Vs. Sanjeev Arora) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. October 6, 2026 D. Tamang Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Tripathi, Surya Prakash Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Vikram D. Chauhan,J.) Om Prakash Yadav .....Petitioner(s) Sanjeev Kumar Arora .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA TAMANG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad