[2026:RJ-JP:32643] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6381/2026 CNR: RJHC020312792026 | URN: CW / 14134U / 2026 Neetu Parmar D/o Shri Rajkumar Parmar, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Near Veena Goyal Hospital, Dholpur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Through Its Secretary, Ghooghra Ghati, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Banwari Lal Sharma Mr. Namo Narayan Sharma Mr. Mohit Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yash Joshi for Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG Mr. M.F. Baig Dr. Mrinal Joshi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 17/08/2026 In compliance with the directions passed vide order dated 11.08.2026, Dr. Mrinal Joshi has marked attendance and submitted that there are multifarious reasons for discrepancies in the medical certificate; for instance; one of the reasons can be when the competent authority has issued a certificate when the petitioner or like persons were in their teenage or infant age, whereas the present medical board has evaluated such person after a lapse of decade; secondly, that for lack of facilities at the level of competent authority and restricted resources, that may [2026:RJ-JP:32643] (2 of 3) [CW-6381/2026] vary in the results which are now undertaken by appropriate medical board. It is also submitted that there are changes in the prescribed criteria of calculation of disability along with the technology and other reasons. Learned counsel and the Medical Expert have placed reliance on the circular dated 15.07.2026 issued by DoPT, wherein the said expertise were visualized. It is submitted that now as per the physical disability, initially and originally a disability verification board constituted at the first instance, comprises of required experts, forensic experts and other members; to check and balance an appropriate mechanism is also provided, and that the same constitutes of a person of higher authorities and expertise which examine the same independently. In the light of the said circular, it is submitted that the problems which are arising on account of discrepancies and the certificates issued by competent authority and by the board for the physically disabled persons are duly addressed. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that this petition has become infructuous as the desired prayer has been duly awarded by the medical board and the petitioner has been found to be more disabled, than the prescribed percentage. It is submitted that the petitioner has also been selected and the only impediment is pendency of the present petition. The said fact qua the happening of medical board and calculation of medical percentage is not disputed by the respondents. Heard. [2026:RJ-JP:32643] (3 of 3) [CW-6381/2026] Considering the facts and circumstances and being satisfied with the explanation as offered by the concerned Medical Expert, this Court deems it appropriate to dismiss the present petition as rendered infructuous, by holding that if the medical board permission qualifies the petitioner to be eligible and there is no other impediment, appropriate result and outcome be declared and the present petition will not come in the way of the eligibility of the petitioner. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as rendered infructuous. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J 2/CHANDAN