1 2026:HHC:25434 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 43 of 2026 Decided on: 30.06.2026 ________________________________________________ Ranto Devi ....Petitioner Versus Dr. Amarjeet K. Sharma …Respondent _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate vice Mr. Tek Chand, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Learned Additional Advocate General submits that in a similar matter, an SLP has been filed before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, wherein the judgment of this Court has been stayed. In this respect, he has also placed on record copy of order dated 24.03.2025 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:25434 2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, at this stage, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition. 3. However, the petitioner is at liberty to revive the present contempt petition as and when the occasion arises. 4. The petition is disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) 30th June, 2026 Judge (Kiran)