IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.10391 of 2026 Decided on 30th June, 2026 Rakesh Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rahul Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No.1 to 4. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Issue notice. Mr. Rahul Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1to 4. 2. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has, inter alia, prayed for the following reliefs:- “a) That office order dated 23.01.2026 (Annexure P- 5) may kindly be quashed and set aside with further directions to the respondents to pay the arrears of pay scales from the year 2013 alongwith interest @ 9% per month, as per amended Rules relating to the terms of employment and working conditions of the employees of Primary Agricultural Credit Cooperative Societies 2010. b) That respondent may kindly be directed to grant the pay scale as per amended Rules from the year 2013 and pay fixation benefits may kindly be paid to the petitioner alongwith other ancillary benefits.” 3. A perusal of Annexure P-5 quashing of which is prayed by way of this writ petition demonstrates that it is just a report that has been submitted by the Assistant Registrar to the Registrar Co-operative Societies. 4. This Court is of the considered view that the petition at this stage is not maintainable for the reason that it is for the Authority concerned to take a final call on the basis of the report on the issue before it and in case the petitioner is aggrieved by the final order that may be passed by the Authority, then, he may seek legal remedy against it as is available in law. 4. With these observations, the petition is disposed of as not maintainable at this stage. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge June 30, 2026 (Vinod)