Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:4417
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 10342 of 2025
Dayal Munda, aged about 20 years, son of late Soma Munda, R/o Marangi, P.O + P.S. Gidhour, District- Chatra, Jharkhand.
.… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
..... Opposite Party
---------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
---------
For the Petitioner :Mr. Shailesh Kumar Pandey, Adv.
For the Opposite Party : Mr. P.D. Agrawal, Adv.
--------- 03/Dated: 16.02.2026
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 318(4), 274, 275, 3(5) of BNS and Section 47 (a) of Excise Act.
3.
Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is languishing in jail since 15.06.2025 and he has been falsely implicated in this case as no incriminating article has been recovered or seized from the possession of this petitioner and petitioner has no concerned with the seized foreign liquor factory.
4. Per Contra, learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail.
5. Having regard to the gravity of the offence and the allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail at this stage.
6. Accordingly, the instant bail application stands dismissed.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) February 16, 2026 Uploaded on ……./…../2026
Fahim/