Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13665 (KAR)

SOMASHEKHARAYYA M H v. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY

CRL.P/11394/2025 · 2026-03-04

S R Krishna Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13279 CRL.P No. 11394 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11394 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SOMASHEKHARAYYA M H S/O. HALAIAH.M.G. AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 2. NEELAMMA M R W/O.HALAIAH M.G, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, 3. HALAYYA.M.G. S/O. GURUSIDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, 4. CHANNAIAH.M.H S/O. HALAIAH M.G. AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, ALL THE PETITIONERS 1 TO 4 ARE RESIDENT OF KANIVEBILACHI, CHANNAGIRI TALUK, DAVANGERE DISTRICT-577231 5. BHAGYA PRAVEEN W/O. PRAVEEN HIREMATH B S, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O. 883/8, VRUSHABHA, 3RD FLOOR, SARASWATHI NAGAR, DAVANGERE.-577001 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. H DEVENDRAPPA.,ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13279 CRL.P No. 11394 of 2025 AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY SHIVAMOGGA WOMEN POLICE STATION REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTO HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE -560001 2. SMT.SHRUTHI M S, W/O. SOMASHEKHARAYYA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O. SHRI RENUKACHARYA NILAYA, BHUVANESHWARI LAYOUT, OLD GURUPURA, HOLEHONNUR ROAD, SHIVAMOGGA TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT -577227 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.RAJAT SUBRAMANYAM, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CASE REGISTERED AS CRIME NO.48/2024 REGISTERED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT I.E., JMFC II COURT, SHIVAMOGGA FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES P/U/S. 498(A), 504, 323, 313, 506, 114, 34 OF IPC, SHIVAMOGGA, BENGALURU AGAINST THE PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED HERE AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13279 CRL.P No. 11394 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 03.02.2026 stating that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. 2. Memo reads as under: "It is submitted that the above criminal petition may kindly be dismissed as withdrawn, in the interest of justice." 3. The aforesaid memo is taken on record. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE VM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18