Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13658 (ALL)

LAKHAMI SINGH AND 8 OTHERS v. DIGAMBAR SINGH AND 4 OTHERS

FAFO/1248/2026 · 2026-10-05

Anish Kumar Gupta

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 1248 of 2026 Court No. - 34 Sl. No. 19 HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. Heard Shri Rajneesh Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the appellant and Shri Bharat Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2. 2. The instant appeal has been filed by the appellant against an order dated 27.2.2026 whereby application for interim injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 C.P.C. filed by the plaintiff/respondents in Original Suit No. 816 of 2025 has been allowed and the appellants herein/defendants have been restrained from interfering over the property in question. 3. The said original suit is still pending. Learned counsel for the appellant apprehends that under the garb of the impugned order dated 27.4.2026 the respondents may change and alter the nature of the property in question during the pendency of the original suit. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent on the other hand undertakes that the respondents will not alter or change the nature of the property in question during the pendency of the original suit. 5. In such view of the matter, the instant appeal is disposed of without interfering with the impugned order dated 27.4.2026 with an embargo that the plaintiffs/respondents shall not alter or change the nature of the property in question during the pendency of the original suit. Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Rajneesh Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bharat Pratap Singh Lakhami Singh And 8 Others .....Appellant(s) Digambar Singh And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. Learned counsel for the appellants/defendants also undertakes that they will also not interfere with the property in question nor make any effort to alter the nature of the property in question. 7. However, the trial court is requested to expedite the proceedings of the said original suit pending before it and shall try to conclude the proceedings as early as possible preferably within a period of one year from the date of production of the certified copy of this order. 8. Learned counsels for both the sides also undertake to cooperate with the trial court in expeditious disposal of the suit. October 6, 2026 o.k. FAFO No. 1248 of 2026 2 (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) Digitally signed by :- OM KRISHNA CHOUDHARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- OM KRISHNA CHOUDHARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad