Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13657 (BOM)

SHAIKH MUSTAK SHAIKH AMIR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/987/2026 · 2026-09-30

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

987.2026WP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 927 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 987 OF 2026 SHAIKH MUSTAK SHAIKH AMIR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Adv. Divya P. Khandelwal h/f Mr.Jadhwar S.V. APP for Respondent/State : Mrs. U.S. Bhosale ... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 30.09.2026 P.C. : 1. Though the petition is filed for completing the investigation and filing charge-sheet along with arrest of the accused in connection with F.I.R. No.137/2023 of Jalna Taluka Police Station, but learned A.P.P. placed on record the communication dated 18.08.2026 mentioning that in connection with the aforesaid F.I.R., “A” Summary report is filed before the concerned Court. 2. Under such circumstances, by granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge the said “A” Summary, the petition stands disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE sga 2026:BHC-AUG:45793-DB