{1} 93-wp-9877-2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 93 WRIT PETITION NO. 9877 OF 2023 Pallavi Uttam Dongare VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others ... Mr. A.K. Shingare h/f Mr. L.H. Kawale, Advocate for the Petitioner Ms. Neha Kamble, AGP for State Mr. Sachin Munde, Advocate for Respondent No. 3 ....... CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 28th SEPTEMBER, 2026 PER COURT : 1. Indisputably, the issue raised in this petition is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in Writ Petition No. 2271 of 2021 at Principal Seat and Writ Petition No. 14481 of 2023. 2. For the reasons stated in the above decisions, writ petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ and ‘C’, which are as follows: “B. By issuing appropriate writ, order or directions in the like nature, may kindly be hold and declare that, petitioner is recruited and appointed prior to the cut of date i.e. 1.11.2005 and therefore she is entitled to get the benefit of Old Pension Scheme and for that purpose issue necessary orders. C. By issuing appropriate writ, order or directions in the like nature, may kindly be hold and declare that, petitioner is entitled to get the benefits of Maharashtra Civil Service 2026:BHC-AUG:44114-DB {2} 93-wp-9877-2023 (Pension) Rules 1982 and Maharashtra Civil Services (Commutation of pension) Rules, 1984 and General Provident Fund Scheme (GPF) and for that purpose issue necessary orders.” (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) Bhagyawant Punde