Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 38813 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Kuldeep Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent No.1 and Sri Habib Ahmad, learned counsel for the respondent-Bank.
2. By means of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for de-freezing of Bank Account No.50291557330.
3. Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank, on the basis of the instructions received, submits that only disputed transaction has been put on hold in the bank account.
4. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent-Bank that only the disputed amount shall remain on hold. The respondent-Bank is further directed to permit the petitioner to operate aforesaid salary account in accordance with law and in the light of the judgment of this Court in Ashish Rawat v. Union of India and 6 others passed in Writ C No. 1489 of 2026 decided on
08.04.2026. October 6, 2026 Kuldeep Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Kumar Pandey, Prashant Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C., Habib Ahmad, Kuldeep Kumar (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Arvind Kumar Yadav .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad