1 2026:HHC:25436 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 518 of 2026 Decided on: 30.06.2026 ________________________________________________ Ominder Singh ....Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & Anr. …Respondent _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Ms. Rinkle, Advocate vice Mr. Balwant Singh Thakur, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 16.06.2026 along with copy of office order of even date, wherein it has been stated that the representation of the petitioner has been considered and decided by the respondent Department. 2. Since judgment under reference has duly been complied with, therefore, no further orders are required to be 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:25436 passed in the present contempt petition and the matter is closed. 3. However, if the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to assail office order dated 16.06.2026, in accordance with law. 4. The petition is disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) 30th June, 2026 Judge (Kiran)