2026:HHC:10589 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.4134 of 2026 Decided on: 07.04.2026 Kishore Kumar Rawat … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioner: Mr. Sudhir Bhatnagar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rajpal Thakur, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Rajpal Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of respondents. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has again preferred a representation, which though has not been appended with the petition and he submits that direction be issued to the Authority concerned to decide the same. Learned Counsel submits that Annexure P-9 is the forwarding letter of the representation. The representation has been made available for the perusal of the Court. 2. As it is evident from Annexure P-9 that some representation has been filed by the petitioner, which has not been decided, this petition is disposed of with the direction that the representation filed by the petitioner be decided in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks in view of the averments made therein as well as judgments, if any, being relied upon by the petitioner, by passing a speaking order. Pending miscellaneous 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:10589 application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge April 07, 2026 (Rishi)