SADHANA SRIVASTAVA AND ANOTHER v. KRISHNA PAL AND 3 OTHERS
A227/13481/2026 · 2026-10-07
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13648 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13648 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13481 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:-
"I. Issue a order and direction in nature of Mandamus directing the court below i.e. Motor Accident Claim Tribunal- North, Prayagraj to fix a date for final hearing and conclude the hearing. II. Issue a order or direction in nature mandamus directing the court below to decide the Claim Petition no. 136 of 2017 within a stipulated period as fixed by the this Hon'ble Court."
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that Motor Accident Claims Petition is pending consideration since 2017 before Motor Accident Claims Tribunal.
3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, or calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to the private respondent, the matter is being disposed of, at the admission stage, with a direction upon Tribunal concerned to decide the pending Claim Petition no. 136 of 2017 after hearing all the concerned parties, strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
4. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merits. October 8, 2026//(V. S. SINGH) Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shailendra Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anubhav Sinha (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Sadhana Srivastava And Another .....Petitioner(s) Krishna Pal And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad