Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13645 (ALL)

RAVISHANKAR AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/23152/2024 · 2026-10-04

Jai Krishna Upadhyay, Rajeev Misra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23152 of 2024 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J. HON'BLE LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA, J. 1. Case called out in revised list. 2. Even though the names of Mr. Brijesh Kumar Verma and Mr. Rakesh Kumar Srivastava, Advocates are duly published in the cause list as counsel for petitioners but neither they nor any one on their behalf is present to press present writ petition even in revised call. 3. Learned A.G.A. for State-respondents 1 and 2 is present. 4. Petitioners-Ravishankar And 3 Others have approached this Court by means of present Criminal Misc. Writ Petition challenging the FIR dated 29.11.2024 lodged by first informant-respondent-3, Shiv Prasad Saroj and registered as Case Crime No. 391 of 2024, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 I.P.C., Police Station- Machhalishahar, District-Jaunpur. 5. Present writ petition came up for admission on 21.01.2025 and this Court passed the following order:- "1. On the request of learned counsel for the informant, the case is passed over for the day enabling him to bring on record the relevant documents demonstrating the informant's stake in the property in question on the next date fixed in the matter. 2. Put up this matter on 24.1.2025, as fresh. 3. It is provided that till the next date of listing, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners in pursuance of the impugned First Information Report dated 29.11.2024 registered as Case Crime No.391 of 2024, under Sections 419, 420, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Brijesh Kumar Verma, Rakesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : Abhishek Kumar Saroj, G.A., Nagendra Bahadur Singh, Rajdhari Ravishankar And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) 467, 468 I.P.C., P.S. - Machhalishahar, District- Jaunpur. " 6. Aforementioned interim order was extended on 24.01.2025 and 11.08.2025. 7. As no one appears on behalf of petitioners to press this writ petition even in revised call, it is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution. 8. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. October 5, 2026 Imtiyaz CRLP No. 23152 of 2024 2 (Lakshmi Kant Shukla,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.) Digitally signed by :- IMTIYAZ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad