[2026:RJ-JP:33875] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1164/2026 CNR: RJHC020636072026 | URN: CCP / 1218U / 2026 1. Shabbir Hussain Ansari S/o Shri Abdul Nazir Ansari, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Bus Stand, Shivraj Nagar Hindoli, Dist. Bundi, Rajasthan. 2. Vinod Kumar S/o Shri Ramlal, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Takla Jajawar Nainwa, Bundi, Rajasthan. 3. Pawan Kumar Goutam S/o Shri Mahaveer Prasad, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Bramhapuri Shivraj Nagar, Hindoli Bundi, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Sh. V. Shriniwas, State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan 3. Smt. Gaytri Rathore, Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. Sh. Ravi Prakash Mathur, Director, Medical And Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Swasthya Bhawan, C- Scheme, Jaipur. 5. Sh. Ravi Prakash Sharma, Mukhyamantri Nishulk Dawa Yojana (Mndy), Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 6. Mr. Mustak Khan Kayamkhani, Director, Mukhyamantri Nishulk Janch Yojana (Mnjy), Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 7. Dr. Om Prakash Samar, Chief Medical And Health Officer, Dist. Bundi, Rajasthan. 8. Dr. Ramsingh Meena, Rajasthan Medicare Relief Society, Through Its Member Secretary, Dist. Bundi, Rajasthan. 9. Dr. Kamlesh Malav, Community Health Centre Through Its Medical Officer In-Charge Cum Secretary, Rajasthan Medicare Relief Society, Taleda, Bundi, Rajasthan. 10. Dr. Laxmi Verma, Community Health Centre Through Its [2026:RJ-JP:33875] (2 of 3) [CCP-1164/2026] Medical Officer In-Charge Cum Secretary, Rajasthan Medicare Relief Society, Taleda, Bundi, Rajasthan. 11. Dr. Sanchit Yadav, Primary Health Centre Through Its Medical Officer In-Charge Cum Secretary, Rajasthan Medicare Relief Society, Dablana, Bundi, Rajasthan. 12. Dr. Rakesh Mandawara, Primary Health Centre Through Its Medical Officer In-Charge Cum Secretary, Rajasthan Medicare Relief Society, Basoli, Tehsil Hindoli, Dist. Bundi, Rajasthan. 13. Dr. Lucky Sharma, Primary Health Centre Through Its Medical Officer In-Charge Cum Secretary, Rajasthan Medicare Relief Society, Gothara, Tehsil Hindoli, Dist. Bundi, Rajasthan. 14. Dr. Imran, Primary Health Centre Through Its Medical Officer In-Charge Cum Secretary, Rajasthan Medicare Relief Society, Neem Ka Khera, Tehsil Hindoli, Dist. Bundi, Rajasthan. 15. Dr. Rashi Panwar, Primary Health Centre Through Its Medical Officer In-Charge Cum Secretary, Rajasthan Medicare Relief Society, Ranipura, Tehsil Hindoli, Dist. Bundi, Rajasthan. 16. Dr. Awinash Sharma, Community Health Centre Through Its Medical Officer In-Charge Cum Secretary, Rajasthan Medicare Relief Society, Dabi, Bundi, Rajasthan. 17. Mr. Shailesh Soni, Through Its Proprietor, M/s Soni Tech Education And Welfare, 2-C-32 Vikas Nagar, Bundi. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Balkishan Saini For Respondent(s) : Ms. Tanvisha Pant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 21/08/2026 This contempt petition has been filed alleging non- compliance of order dated 12.01.2026 passed in SBCWP No. 6208/2020. [2026:RJ-JP:33875] (3 of 3) [CCP-1164/2026] The Court allowed liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to the concerned respondent authority who was to decide the same by reasoned and speaking order. The petitioner said to have submitted the representation dated 23.01.2023 to the Chief Medical and Health Officer, Bundi. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents states that the Chief Medical and Health Officer, Bundi has decided the representation of the petitioner vide order dated 25.02.2026. In view of the fact that the representation of the petitioner has been decided, in opinion of this Court, the respondents have complied with the order of the Court. Accordingly this contempt petition stands disposed. Contempt notices stand discharged. The petitioners would be at liberty to challenge the order passed by the respondent by availing the appropriate remedy in case they feel aggrieved by the same. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava/95