Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26806 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-576 Year-2024 Thana- RAJAOLI District- Nawada ====================================================== Bablu Kumar Son of Arjun Mahto @ Bheda Mahto @ Arjun Prasad Yadav @ Arjund Prasad Resident of Village- Rajauli Near Purani Bust Stand, P.S.- Rajauli, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Arjun Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 06-05-2026 Heard the parties.
2. This is the second attempt of the petitioner for grant of regular bail in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 576 of 2024, S.T. No. 221/2025 dated 14.12.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2) read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S. Later on 103 of the B.N.S. was added. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 16.09.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 47026 of 2025.
3. As per the prosecution case, on 12.12.2024, the petitioner and 15 unknown persons in a pre-planned manner were waiting at Pranchak Mor, Rajauli and when the informant's grandson namely, Monu Kumar reached Pranchak Mor, then the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26806 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026 2/2 petitioner assaulted him with lathi on his head and other accused persons also assaulted him with danda, iron-rod and took out five thousand rupees from his pocket and a gold pendent from his neck. Thereafter, the injured was taken to the hospital for treatment.
4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the trial is progressing and three out of four witnesses have been examined.
5. Considering the aforesaid facts, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed again.
tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T