APHC010237402026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1378/2026 Between: 1. PENUMATSA SUBBARAJU, S/O GOPALARAJU, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O KOMARIGIRI VILLAGE, I. POLAVARAM MANDAL, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SEERAM RAJKUMAR, S/O SURYANAIAYANA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O FLAT NO. C3, SESHADRI TOWERS, RAMANAYYAPETA, KAKINADA. 2. KOMMULA MANGA RAJAKUMARI, W/O GANGARAJU, R/O D.NO. 6- 1- 12/1, RAMAKRISHNA NAGAR, ARNALAPURAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order dated 16-02-2026 passed in LA. No. 2 of 2026 in O.S.No.116 of 2019 on the file of the Court of the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Cum Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Mummidivaram allow the said application by directing the trial Court to obtain specimen signatures and thumb impressions of the petitioner and send Ex.Al for expert opinion and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in O.S. No. 116 of 2019 on the file of the Court of the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Cum Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Mummidivaram, pending disposal of the Civil Revision Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MAKIREDDY MANOJ Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CIVIL REVISOIN PETITION No.1378 of 2026 ORDER: After advancing arguments to some extent, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition and requested to grant liberty to file a fresh interlocutory application before the trial Court along with contemporaneous signatures. 2. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the trial Court by filing a fresh Interlocutory Application. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND Dated: 01.05.2026 CVD