Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13598 (MAD)

Anandakumar v. State, rep. by The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/10055/2026 · 2026-04-21

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 10055 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 10055 of 2026 Ananda Kumar S/o. Sivaprakasam, Munusami Street, Cheyyar, Tiruvetipuram, Thiruvannamalai District 604 407. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State, rep. by The Inspector of Police, Anakkavoor Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District. (Crime No. 29 of 2026) ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, to enlarge the Petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime No. 29 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr. V.R. Appaswamee For Respondent(s): MR.P.DHILEEPAN, GOVT.ADVOCATE (CRL SIDE) ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 303(2) & 326(a) of BNS in Crime No.29 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 10055 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with other accused was illegally transported two units of sand with the help of lorry and JCB without any valid permission. On seeing the de facto complainant, the petitioner escaped from the scene of occurrence. Hence, the case. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and has been falsely implicated in this case by the respondent police and prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution’s case and, on instructions, submitted that there are five previous cases similar in nature pending against the petitioner. opposed the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. In such view of the matter, the petitioner has five previous cases of the same nature, which clearly demonstrates that the petitioner has misused the liberty granted by this Court. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 10055 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 21-04-2026 DRL To 1.The Inspector of Police, AnakkavoorPolice Station, Thiruvannamalai District. (Crime No. 29 of 2026) 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 10055 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. DRL CRL OP No. 10055 of 2026 21-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis