Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13598 (BOM)

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, LIFT IRRIGATION PORJECT DIVISION, OSMANABAD v. MOHAN VASANT JADHAV AND OTHERS

FA/4352/2017 · 2026-09-28

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

30-FA-4352-2017.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 30 FIRST APPEAL NO. 4352 OF 2017 Executive Engineer, Lift Irrigation Porject Division, Osmanabad VERSUS Mohan Vasant Jadhav And Others …… Ms. Sunita D. Shelke, Appellant, Advocate for Appellant Ms. A.B. Kale, Advocate for Respondent No.1 …… CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 28 SEPTEMBER, 2026 PER COURT : 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant/Acquiring Body. 2. By this appeal, the Appellant assail the Judgment and award dated 13.04.2010 passed by the learned Jt.Civil Judge Senior Division, Ahmedpur in L.A.R. No.175 of 2007. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned counsel for the claimants submit that the compensation enhanced by the learned Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer. 4. In view of the aforesaid submissions and having regard to the policy decision of the State Government contained in Government Resolution No. Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1 /A-4 dated 03.11.201 with Corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only upto four times. 2026:BHC-AUG:44555 30-FA-4352-2017.odt 2 5. Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned order. Hence, the present Appeal is dismissed. 6. The Claimant is at liberty to withdraw the amount deposited by the acquiring body before the learned Reference Court, if any. 7. In view of dismissal of the Appeal, pending Civil Applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of accordingly. [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ] JUDGE S P Rane