CRM-M-23202-2026 1 124 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-23202-2026 Date of Decision: 28.04.2026 ASHOK .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr. Naveen Kashyap, Advocate for the petitioner. **** H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS read as Section 482 Cr.P.C seeking directions to official respondents No. 2 to 4 to take appropriate action on the complaint /representation dated 03.04.2026. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has preferred a representation dated 03.04.2026 (Annexure P-4) respondent No.3- Deputy Commissioner of Police, Sonepat, Haryana but no action has been taken so far. Learned counsel submits that he would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.3- Deputy Commissioner of Police, Sonepat, Haryana to look into his representation and take appropriate steps at the earliest. 3. Notice of motion to respondents No. 1 to 4. RENU RAWAT 2026.04.29 16.18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-23202-2026 2 4. At the asking of the Court, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jangra, AAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 4. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 6. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and the limited prayer made by the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3- Deputy Commissioner of Police, Sonepat, Haryana to consider and decide the representation dated 03.04.2026 (Annexure P-4) of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and pass an appropriate order. (H.S.GREWAL) 28.04.2026 JUDGE renu Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No RENU RAWAT 2026.04.29 16.18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh